Texas Sues GA, PA, WI, MI in U.S. Supreme Court

Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules


Jason Pollak, Brietbart, December 7, 2020

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

17 STATES JOIN TEXAS SUIT ON ELECTION

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD A PDF OF THE TEXAS SUIT

Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.

This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.

Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

 

Click Here to Read our AD in the Washington Times calling for President Trump to TEMPORARILY Invoke LIMITED Martial Law for the SOLE PURPOSE of having the U.S. Military conduct a free and fair federal election Re-Vote!


Click Here to Watch the Newest We the People Convention News & Opinion Podcast!


Click Here for links to the Voter Fraud Evidence in every contested state - Updated Daily!
 

New Podcast Posted Every Week!

Watch ANY ARCHIVE of the We the People Convention Podcast by clicking on "PLAYLIST".

Recent News

Trump Statement on Abortion
Trump Statement on Abortion

Trump Statement on Abortion

READ MORE

British Cass Report Calls for End to use of Puberty Blockers
British Cass Report Calls for End to use of Puberty Blockers

The Cass report and the unforgivable puberty blockers scandal

READ MORE

Commission Finds China Rigged Canadian Elections
Commission Finds China Rigged Canadian Elections

Canadian Intelligence Commission Finds China Interfered in Last Two Elections

READ MORE

Latest Video

Klingenstein's Trump's Virtues Part II
Klingenstein's Trump's Virtues Part II

Second video where Tom Klingenstein spells out the Virtues of Donald Trump

WATCH NOW

©2024, We the People Convention