Click the Link Above to Watch the 10 Minute Video
Do you believe what Glenn Beck says in this Video?
TRANSCRIPT: My Blunt Warning To Washington After Tucker Carlson's GOP Exit
Let me tell you something that happened on a podcast about a week ago. Uh, Tucker Carlson was on a podcast, and here is what he said on the podcast.
I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support how could I or any American voter support a political party that's not loyal to the United States, that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens? Like that's that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that. And I'm not going to and I think I voted Republican my entire life. I worked at Fox News, CNN, MSNBC. I, I've been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party. I mean, very consistent defender. But there's no defending this because it's immoral. And it's exactly the opposite of what a political party in a democracy is charged with doing, which is representing its own voters, its own citizens, its own nation and they're not doing that. So no, I'm out. And if I'm out, then I think a lot of other people are out.
Okay. So let me just take this. What he's saying, if I am out that I think a lot of other people are out, that's that's the really important part. And you can think about what you want about Tucker Carlson. I'm not here. I'm not going to canonize him. I'm also not going to bury him on this. Um, that's for others to take on if they want to. I'm not going to get into the mud if he's building a third option, which he didn't say he was, but if he is or recommending a third option, then I'd like to know what that third option is. Um, you know, and we'll take that because I'd like to know what his political solution is to holding back tyranny. Besides Israel, bad Iran and Russia, not so bad. Maga you know, everybody's saying this is a split of mega Maga was born out of the Tea Party, disaffection with both parties. But pragmatism ultimately delivered Trump via the GOP vehicle. It was working the way it was supposed to work. So let's just look at him saying, I cannot will not vote for another Republican again. Who hasn't said that as a Republican? Why is why is this bothering people? I think it's bothering some people because coming from Tucker, a lot of people, and I think rightfully so, are worried about where are your loyalties here.
But if we today just deal with the words that he said, you know, I can't vote for, I can't blame him. I genuinely can't because I understand that I've said that I understand the feeling of being asked to keep playing a game with people who have no intention of ever letting you win. Let me talk past you for a second and talk to the people in Washington. Okay. Let me talk to them, to the men and women in Washington, D.C. with an R after your name. Stay with me, because this concerns you. But this part's for them. I told you, I told you this would happen. For years I have said this. I said the day would come when your own people would stop defending you, when their loyalty would run out, when the other side is worse, doesn't work anymore. And you all rolled your eyes. I mean, I had Orrin Hatch say, I'll just do a flag burning amendment and that'll bring them all back. Oh my God. Nope. Now it's real. It's here. You're in action. Or worse, your unwillingness to understand that the days of Paul Ryan are over. I mean, look at the people coming in. They're not like you. They're not. And I'm not sure exactly what Maga actually is. I know everybody wants to make it about Donald Trump and just being a racist, but that's not what it is.
I think Maga is about common sense things that make us strong as a nation again, Donald, Donald Trump and Maga. He was just the first major candidate that said, you know, we're not done as a nation, and I'm not going to manage the decline. That's what people want a healthy and common sense driven country that doesn't destroy their faith and their family and their freedoms. That's what they want. Now, before I say another word to Washington, when this happens, when somebody like Tucker walks, when the next one walks and there will be a next one, people are going to come and say, circle the wagons. You've got to defend the party. No, no, now's not the time. The stakes are too high. Hold the line. If we can just get the white House and the Senate and the House and a supermajority. Don't rush to defend the GOP. Don't do it. Not because you owe them, you know, or the other side. Anything you don't, you don't. But because every time you defend them for free, they teach you the betrayal is survivable, that they can ignore you and keep you. The only language a comfortable incumbent understands is the sound of the door closing behind a voter who's done. Yes, we have to stop the authoritarian and crazy left.
Yes, but we need. We need to find the Republicans or whatever that. Stand for something. Stand for something. Not just to burn it down. Not to go. Jews. Bad. Russia. Good. Mhm. Washington. Listen to me carefully. I'm trying to help you, and almost no one around you is. You're not going to survive this. And I don't mean a tough cycle coming your way. I mean, you are building with your own hands a movement aimed directly at you, and you deserve it. And there's exactly one way to take the power out of a movement like that. Actually, you know, there's a couple of ways. First of all, you don't outspend it. You don't out message it. Cornyn just outspent his challenger nearly 9 to 1 in Texas. And the voters retired him anyway. 30 years of seniority gone in a single night. Money didn't save the establishment in Texas. And it's not going to save you either. Now, there are two ways that I can think of. You take the steam out of a movement where people are like, I'm leaving the party. The first one is the obvious one that every politician in power will jump to immediately. And that's silence. The people who are saying it. That makes you a fascist and authoritarian. And I, well, I know people on the left are trying it, and I'm sure people on the right will try it and you'll lose.
But so will the Republic. The other way to go is to simply remove the reason it exists. And the only way to do that is to start listening to the people who sent you there, and then actually do the thing they sent you to do. That's it. That's the secret in the sauce. Listen and respond. Be a mirror to what your own voters are telling you instead of a wall. I want the GOP to win because I don't want to start a whole new thing. And it's just. I don't want a third party. Look at France. I want you to win. America needs you to win. But not who you are. Not is who you are. I don't want any of that. What I'm telling you right now is I'm describing the natural consequences of you ignoring the voter. So let me give you a test. This is a simple one. Okay. It'll cost you nothing except courage. But the save act on the floor. Do it, Do it. Proof of citizenship. To register to vote in a federal election. Do it. That's the whole thing. It's not a 5050 issue. You get to hide behind. Roughly 7 in 10 Americans supported independent supported. Half of Democrats supported. And among Republican voters, your voters, the ones whose name are on your name, is on their yard signs.
It's not even a question. It's a settled matter. So put it up. You don't even need it to pass. I pray that it does. But all we need really is a roll call. I want the vote recorded. I want every name on the board lit up green or red. That way the whole country can see it. Because when something has 70% of a nation behind it, 70 plus people among the people who elected you, it's it's not it's complicated. It's not complicated. There's no, no nuance here. It's really simple. Did you vote for what your people said you should vote for or not? And that that's the real reason. That's the real reason why it never comes to a vote. Not because they'd lose, but because you'd be seen. You have to be very well aware of people who are the voice of your grievance. That's a very dangerous place to be. Are they a voice of your grievance or are they exploiting your grievance? I don't think either of them are great, but one of them is very dangerous. And that's that's what you really have to take from the story that I just gave you last. And in several other cases, who is exploiting your grievance and who is actually voicing your grievance?
