The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY a Documentary about people dying after taking the Covid "shot" from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
All Americans MUST DEMAND a full Investigation of the reasons for the rising death rates world wide after the Covid Shot's had been administered.
The Images in this Documentary are very disturbing and NOT FOR VIEWING by Anyone under the Age of 18!
At the time this Video was posted on our website they had already had close to 8 million views . . .
Click Here to Watch the Stew Peters Network on Rumble
Here is a Critical Reveiw of the Died Suddenly Movie:
‘Died Suddenly’ is Typical Trash from Stew Peters
BY DR JOSH GUETZKOW 23 NOVEMBER 2022 9:06 PM
FoxNews: Vaccinated Americans a majority of COVID deaths for first time in August
This Post is in Defense of the Died Suddenly Movie:
Died Suddenly - Infighting and Common Sense
Tom Renz
I think Died Suddenly is one of the most important films to come out since COVID has started. Full disclosure, I had nothing to do with its production, did not know I’d make an appearance, and get nothing from it. Not only do I get nothing from the movie, the fact that it has been absolutely viral means there are a ton of “fact check” lies that are already hitting and more coming. This means I’ll have more work because I’ll have to explain why the lies the mainstream is pushing on the movie is garbage. Further, it appears there might have been a couple of errors in the movie which means the mainstream will focus on those while downplaying the inarguable truths contained therein.
There have been some that have taken issue with the movie that are also on the right side of this fight. I understand their concerns. Some with concerns are brilliant scientists that view things through the lens of scientific purity. They feel that anything that has any errors in it opens us up to scrutiny. This makes complete sense for a true scientist and if this were a journal article that position would be justified. The problem is that this is not a journal article and was not meant to be. Rather, this was a movie designed to force people to talk about tough issues and, in those regards, it did a wonderful job.
Others that are fighting on our side but that are less focused on the science seem to focus their disagreement with Stew on Stew himself and his style. I have not and will not speak negatively about ANY person on my side of this fight. I hear the stuff about the controlled opposition and honestly refuse to get in to it without evidence. If there is evidence it can speak for itself but, as long as the “controlled opposition” is promoting truth I will keep my fight focused on those that are promoting the death jab and other COVID lies. Regardless of whether you like or approve of Stew Peters, his style, or anything else about him, his movie has made an impact and so I am glad he did it.
My view of all of this is the view of a lawyer and regular guy just fighting for freedom. I understand and have background in the science but am not a scientist and cannot pretend to be at the level of many of the people I’ve been privileged to work with. What I am good at is digging out underlying truths and detecting BS (I apologize for the language). With all that said, I am fighting and fighting to win. If we look at this movie in terms of the fight, the question is, does this help or hurt?
I would be very hard pressed to argue this movie does not help with this fight. Whether every word is correct is not relevant to the people watching, what matters is why aren’t these widely discussed issues being fully vetted in public. I don’t care whether one or two of the people that collapsed in the movie ended up living, if even one person in this movie died as portrayed I want to know why. I want a public discussion about it. Those clots… what about those? I know Dr. Ryan Cole and that man has amazing knowledge and integrity and would definitely know the truth and absolutely would NOT lie about this.
I have also spoke with Richard - the embalmer - several times. Those clots are real and tons of other embalmers have spoken off record about the same thing. They won’t go public for fear of ridicule and losing their jobs but they privately tell me the same thing. Richard is not lying and when he sent those rubbery disasters to the one CERTIFIED lab that was willing to study them, the lab said they did not appear natural or even to be blood (the lab is run by my friend Mike Adams - the Health Ranger and owner of the Brighteon network). Why wasn’t anyone talking about this… they are now.
And that is the point. I work with a lot of people that promote a lot of things I disagree with but, in the end, we can all agree that the COVID death jabs are just that - death jabs. If these jabs kill 1% of the people that get them then they are far more dangerous than COVID (especially if we allowed early treatment) and fail to pass legal muster (I’ll explain that in another article but the law requires a balance of harms analysis for these to be on the market). People are talking about that now and that is a win. I’m not a scientific purist and don’t care about style. At the end of the day I want to save lives and get justice. This movie does that so I hope you will help me promote a movie I get nothing out of promoting but knowledge of the fact that it is driving a very important conversation.
You can find the Died Suddenly movie by clicking here.
This Post talks about how not being totally accurate in the movie Dead Suddenly hurts our case:
Sins of Information Warfare
Do the sins of our opposition wash our own sins clean?
Robert W Malone MD, MS
At the moment, there is a very active discussion regarding the increasingly viral video “Died Suddenly”. Other commentators (for example “The Daily Skeptic” and Josh Guetzkow) have appropriately noted that the (generally well funded and produced) video includes segments which are misleading at best, falsely imply one or more cause-effect relationship between a sudden death event and vaccine administration, or otherwise employ cinematic license to stoke outrage. I have previously written regarding the business model of Stoking Rage for the up and coming podcaster, and in my opinion this strategy is fundamentally the same as the “fearporn” business model of corporate media - and in particular CNN.
For what its worth, I hold “our side” to higher standards than I have come to expect from corporate (broadcast and published) media. I reject the assertion that, on the battlefield of the current 21st century unrestricted media and information war which we are immersed in, it is acceptable to employ the tactics of our opponents. I have heard others in the medical resistance community advocate the schoolyard “logic” of “they are doing it to us, and so we have to do it to them”. I firmly reject this. Any “win” on the information war battlefield which is based on this type of rationale will be transitory and self defeating. It is not a win if we become one with the ethics of our opponents.
This is not just an information war, it is a battle over what is right and good versus what is fundamentally evil. Our opponents clearly believe that the ends justify the means, and that ethics - right and wrong- are completely situational and subject to the same logic widely accepted by the “Virtuals” caste; that there is no objective truth or reality, and reality and ethics are whatever one believes them to be. The ultimate derivative of the logic of “cultural relativity”. The logic from which springs the transsexual movement denialism of the genetic/biologic basis of gender.
As I have said so many times, in so many lectures, our opponents in this information war, this war on truth and integrity, have no ethical guardrails. Ethics are entirely situational in their world.
Repetition has merit in this case; our opponents appear to believe that the ends justify the means, and their cause is sufficiently compelling (in their minds) to justify any actions of censorship, defamation, mis- dis- or mal- information deployed to support their cause. In their minds, they are fighting for a higher cause (Globalism? Utilitarianism? Socialism/Marxism? Totalitarianism? Fascism?) which justifies jettisoning ethics and fundamentals of respect for the integrity and dignity of others.
Furthermore, this has become about tribalism and demonstration of tribal allegiance, and is not about me, or you, or medical freedom, or anything rational. This IS about mass formation, or mass psychosis, of the formation of crowds, or whatever term you wish to apply to the phenomenon so thoroughly described and documented by Freud, Le Bon, Arendt, and (yes) Desmet and their contemporaries.
I have consciously and intentionally chosen to cross-post the Daily Skeptic and Josh Guetzkow commentaries concerning “Died Suddenly” because I believe that they have made important points which should be discussed, but in so doing I have become a target for a small troll army which has swarmed those threads with accusations that I have a personal vendetta with Stew Peters, and which have attacked me as if I were the author of the cited essays.
Let me assure you now that I have no time or interest in further engagements with Stew Peters. He is irrelevant, as far as I am concerned. A modern carnival barker.
There is nothing in this “Died Suddenly” which represents new news, as far as I can tell. This seems to mostly be a sensationalized but well-produced video covering information which has been known for quite some time. While Steve Kirsch was interviewed in the film, he did not fund or sponsor the production, or have any input beyond his personal interview, and neither he or his organization endorses it.
For me, this is sort of “round two” on this general topic of “died suddenly” video clips. Long, long ago, in what seems like a galaxy far, far away, I was still on Twitter and GETTR was still coalescing. Which is to say between one and one and one half years ago. And I cross-posted another video regarding the “died suddenly” meme. In that case, the cross post involved a compilation of short video clips of athletes who had “died suddenly”. One of the clips in that montage was of a young male who most definitely died suddenly on the field while competing, but the tragic event took place prior to the SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccine deployment. In other words, it fit the broader “died suddenly” narrative (presumably from acceptance of mRNA vaccine), but this was clearly a false association.
Because I once was one of the more prominent members of the Twitter and Linked In communities who were speaking out concerning the lack of ethics and safety in the EUA mRNA vaccine deployment and mandate policies, I was seen as an important influencer on those platforms. As a consequence of cross-posting a video montage which included a false association involving the tragic death of a young man, I received a rather aggressive and accusatory cease and desist letter from lawyers representing his family and estate. Basically, I was accused of exploiting his death (and the associated video of same) for political purposes, even though I did not produce the video in question (rather, I merely cross-posted it). Strong language was used in asserting that I was intentionally disrespecting the young man and his family.
Frankly, my reaction to the letter was a mix of horror and pity. Pity for the parents and family, who were probably being inadvertently forced to re-live a personal tragedy. Horror that I had in some way compounded or contributed to their pain.
What did I do? I immediately deleted the cross-post, and apologized to the family via their legal representative who had contacted me. I had acted in ignorance. I assumed that the video (which I believed came from a credible source) was accurate. But I had acted wrongly. Immediate deletion and apology, acknowledging the harm inadvertently done, was the closest I could get towards being consistent with my own personal commitment to fundamental integrity, respect for human dignity, and valuing my community (and community ethical standards).
This is directly analogous to one of the apparent breaches of accuracy in the current “Died Suddenly” video, wherein (apparently) an example of sudden death is being used which is demonstrably unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) vaccination. It may or may not even be the same event.
My opinion is that these breaches of technical accuracy are not acceptable.
For either side of the debate. It is often said, when debating an opponent (or an internet troll) that “you are entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts”. Furthermore, these types of “artistic license” distortions of truth cause both damage to the credibility of the arguments being made (which may otherwise be valid), and can also cause psychologic pain.
Furthermore, these types of errors become weapons which will be deployed against us by our opponents in this unrestricted information war battlefield.
Allow me to provide a counter example from recent history. The Jeff Hays video production of “The Real Anthony Fauci,” a full-length feature documentary based on Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s runaway bestseller, was meticulously (internally) fact checked before being released. Anything stated during the many interviews which were used to generate the final product which could not be documented was left on the cutting room floor. It did not rely on either hyperbole or misrepresentation. And (unfortunately) it did not go viral. But it will withstand the test of time.
As stated previously, I could care less about a former bounty hunter who started a podcast to take down Alex Jones, and has seemingly sought to replace him by becoming a sort of well-financed (?huh, where did that come from?) second-tier shadow projection/mimic of a shock jock. Alex Jones, whatever his personal flaws, is the real deal. Just read his book, which analyzes the Klaus Schwab/King George III “Great Reset” agenda. Solid. Factual. Insightful.
The question which I do think we all need to grapple with is what is Stew Peters, and who does he represent? Based on what I have observed, he mostly represents himself. Are his ethics your ethics? Are they our ethics?
The collective answers to these questions by the medical freedom community will further define who we are. What are the ethical standards to which we will hold ourselves?
As far as I am concerned, that is the question that really matters.
The rest is merely a tale, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing, and full of passionate intensity.
This is another Post by Dr. Malone about those who targeted Anti-Vax Citizens Unfairly:
The Dilemma of the Unvaccinated
We Won't Forget. They celebrated our deaths and danced on our gravesby Dr. Robert Malone, the Epoch Times, November 13, 2022
With recent calls for “Pandemic Amnesty” from the groups who destroyed lives and businesses, closed schools, stripped away your freedoms and turned family, friends and neighbors against each other, the unvaccinated and truth tellers find themselves in a pickle.
Morality and civility could argue that we should forgive those who vilified us for choosing medical sovereignty, non-compliance with unconstitutional mandates, and simply questioning the narrative, but it’s not that simple. Some “pro-vaxers” may have been legitimately uniformed or scared to blindly follow health guidelines and government mandates without question. But the mob mentality to demonize the unvaccinated and gaslight society into thinking we were the problem crossed a potentially unforgivable line.
Making the rounds online is an LA Times article from earlier this year titled Mocking anti-vaxxers’ COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes — but may be necessary. The article URL is even titled “why-shouldnt-we-dance-on-the-graves-of-anti-vaxxers.”
The reporter contends:
“Those who have deliberately flouted sober medical advice by refusing a vaccine known to reduce the risk of serious disease from the virus, including the risk to others, and end up in the hospital or the grave can be viewed as receiving their just desserts.
“That’s even more true of those who not only refused the vaccine for themselves, but publicly advocated that others do so.
“It has become common online and in social media for vaccine refusers and anti-vaccine advocates to become the target of ridicule after they come down with COVID-19 and especially if they die from it.”
He even promotes the disgusting and hateful website www.SorryAntivaxxer.com that posts details and photos of deceased “anti-vaxxer activists, who helped spread COVID-19 misinformation on social media” and encourages visitors to “stop others from making the same mistake. GET VACCINATED!”
He also praises a fellow reporter for delighting in the fact that “mocking anti-vaxxers when they get sick has become a bit of a sport.”
There are endless examples of hatred and contemptible acts towards the unvaccinated over the past two years, but to relish in their death is abhorrent. The data and information are now clear that the vaccines did not work as promised and the propaganda machine was lying. Even the CDC admits there is no difference in guidance for vaccinated and unvaccinated.
So, what are the unvaccinated to do?
DON’T be spiteful, DON’T forget and DON’T stop asking questions!
One of the first questions we need to ask, and a concession to be made from the “Pandemic Amnesty” camp, needs to be around whether or not the young and healthy people suddenly dying, have been vaccinated. This should not be taboo, and it should be for the greater scientific community to debate and learn from.
We know now all-cause mortality rates are up, health agencies are now normalizing SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome) and Myocarditis, while blaming deaths of healthy young adults on the side effects of COVID.
To call a truce and work together for answers, the COVID-19 vaccine must be a factor. It’s not gruesome to ask if someone was vaccinated when they died suddenly and for unknown causes. The answer will get us all closer to the truth, potentially save lives, and know where the line is when the next fear-driven propaganda event tries to divide and destroy us.
So, to the hateful mob waving a white flag, please remember…
We WON’T celebrate your deaths, we WON’T wish harm on you, but we WON’T forget that you did.
Robert W Malone MD, MS. Inventor of mRNA & DNA vaccines, RNA as a drug. Scientist, physician, writer, podcaster, commentator and advocate. Believer in our fundamental freedom of free speech. Entire biography can be found at https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/about
