Tom Zawistowski, President of the We the People Convention, Defended Project 2025 after President Trump inexplicably denounced it on Truth Social after being question by the Democrat Media! We the People MUST HAVE Project 2025 if we are to Restore our Nation! Share the Truth below and then ask "If you don't like our plan, show us is YOUR Plan Leftists???"
MYTHS VS. FACTS ABOUT PROJECT 2025
Project2025 is not affiliated with former President Trump. We are a coalition of more than 110 conservative groups advocating policy and personnel recommendations. Here are our responses to the FALSE Charges being made by the Left against Project 2025:
1. End no fault divorce: FALSE
Divorce is not mentioned in our policy handbook, Mandate for Leadership.
2. Complete ban on abortions without exceptions: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership calls for the government to comply with laws that prevent federal funding of abortion. It also calls for federal support for alternatives to abortion, including adoption.
3. Ban contraceptives: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership says nothing about banning or restricting contraception.
4. Additional tax breaks for corporations and the 1%: MISLEADING
Mandate for Leadership calls for LOWER taxes for ALL Americans, to stimulate economic growth and put more money in Americans’ pockets.
5. Higher taxes for the working class: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership calls for LOWER taxes for ALL Americans. Individuals spend their money in more productive ways than the government does.
6. Elimination of unions and worker protections: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership presents different ideas about a conservative labor policy. It calls for combatting the excesses of the Deep State’s bloated federal employee unions, which have ensured that federal employees keep their jobs even if they engage in illegal behavior or perform their jobs poorly.
7. Raise the retirement age: FALSE
Raising the retirement age is nowhere advocated in Mandate for Leadership.
8. Cut Social Security: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership does not advocate cutting Social Security.
9. End Affordable Care Act: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership offers policy suggestions to curb the abuses of the Affordable Care Act.
10. Raise prescription drug prices: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership offers proposals to lower drug prices through competition and innovation.
11. Eliminate the Department of Education: TRUE
Mandate for Leadership calls for an end to the Department of Education. Since the Department was created, educational outcomes have not improved, and the American school system has increasingly fallen behind other countries. Giving more control back to state and local governments and expanding school choice would improve education outcomes for all Americans, especially underprivileged communities. Some functions of the Department would be moved to other departments including Labor, Justice, and Commerce.
12. Use public, taxpayer money for private religious schools: TRUE
Americans are able to use taxpayer money to choose where they shop for groceries, attain housing, and obtain higher education. Religious schools often outperform public schools, and families should have the choice to send their children to these schools.
13. Teach Christian religious beliefs in public schools: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership advocates for all educational opportunities, and for parental rights in education.
14. End free and discounted school lunch programs: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership advocates that the Food and Nutrition Service be moved from the Department of Agriculture to the Department of Health and Human Services. Mandate condemns the Biden administration’s decision to threaten schools that do not comply with radical transgender policies by taking away their funding for school meals for needy students. Additionally, Mandate supports prioritizing school meal programs for those students who are truly needy, not creating an entitlement for almost all students regardless of family income levels.
15. End civil rights and DEI protections in government: MOSTLY FALSE
Mandate for Leadership calls for respecting the civil rights of all Americans, including those who have been censored by the government or had it weaponized against them. Mandate advocates for the end of divisive, race-based, anti-American propaganda in the federal workforce.
16. Ban African American and gender studies in all levels of education: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership does not mention African American studies or gender studies.
17. Ban books and curriculum about slavery: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership does not advocate for banning books or curriculum about slavery.
18. Ending climate protections: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership advocates policies that will produce economic growth through abundant, affordable energy. Famers, hunters, and fishers know how to protect our environment better than D.C. bureaucrats. The Biden administration’s relentless focus on climate has made America less competitive and wasted crucial taxpayer dollars.
19. Increase Arctic drilling: TRUE
The Arctic is of immense strategic importance to America. Mandate for Leadership advocates a strong pursuit of American interests in the region, through economic freedom, through ensuring free and open shipping lanes, and through the development of the vast energy resources of the Arctic.
20. Deregulate big business and the oil industry: MOSTLY TRUE
America needs energy that is plentiful and affordable. Mandate for Leadership calls for an all-of-the-above energy policy that would promote the development of our domestic energy supply, and for fewer burdensome regulations for ALL businesses.
21. Promote and expedite capital punishment: TRUE
The appropriateness of capital punishment divides Americans, and conservatives, of good will. Mandate for Leadership calls for the enforcement of the federal death penalty where appropriate and applicable, and recommends a future presidential administration pursue the death penalty for the most heinous crimes, including those involving violence and the sexual abuse of children, unless Congress says otherwise through legislation.
22. End marriage equality: FALSE
The legal recognition of same-sex marriage is not discussed in Mandate for Leadership. Mandate calls for the protection of faith-based grant recipients who maintain support for the traditional definition of marriage. Mandate also supports conscience protections for those who do not wish to participate in same-sex marriages.
23. Condemn single mothers while promoting only “traditional families”: FALSE
Mandate suggests that a future HHS Secretary replace the policies of the Biden administration that prioritize LGBTQ+ equality, subsidize single motherhood, disincentivize work, and penalize marriage with policies that instead encourage marriage, work, motherhood, fatherhood, and nuclear families.
24. Defund the FBI and Homeland Security: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership supports de-weaponizing the federal government, including the FBI. Mandate’s chapter on the Department of Homeland Security advocates the legislative creation of a standalone Cabinet-level agency with a focus on the border and immigration, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CPB), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), and the Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL). It also recommends that legislation be pursued to move other component parts of DHS to other agencies, including the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense, the Department of the Treasury, and the FBI.
25. Use military to break up domestic protests: FALSE
The “protests” referenced in Mandate for Leadership are protests in Iran against its anti-American leadership; and protests of parents at school board meetings in opposition to critical race theory and COVID mandates. Both protests are referenced positively. Mandate also protests the FBI’s harassment of protesting parents and condemns the arrest by armed FBI agents of a man who had protested at an abortion clinic a year earlier.
26. Mass deportation of immigrants and incarceration in “camps”: MISLEADING
Mandate supports an orderly and lawful immigration system. It advocates that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Office of Removal Operations be primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the removal of those who have violated our immigration laws. It also calls for additional resources to put an end to President Biden’s border crisis and enforce immigration laws.
27. End birthright citizenship: FALSE
There is no mention of ending birthright citizenship in Mandate for Leadership.
28. Ban Muslims from entering the country: FALSE
There is no mention of banning Muslims from entering the United States in Mandate for Leadership.
29. Eliminate federal agencies like the FDA, EPA, NOAA and more: FALSE
Mandate for Leadership’s plan would not eliminate the FDA or the EPA, and NOAA’s functions would be transferred to other agencies, the private sector, and states and territories.
30. Continue to pack the Supreme Court and lower courts with right-wing judges: FALSE
The only people calling for packing the judiciary are those on the Left, who do it every time the Supreme Court or a lower court makes decisions they don’t like.
Trump says he knows ‘nothing about’ Project 2025 conservative effort under attack
by Cami Mondeaux, Washington Examiner, July 5, 2024
Former President Donald Trump said he does not know anything about Project 2025, a presidential transition framework led by the Heritage Foundation that conservatives have lauded as a way to reshape the federal government should Trump be reelected.
In a Truth Social post on Friday, Trump said he knows “nothing about Project 2025” and that he does not know who is behind the effort. However, the former president noted he disagrees with a handful of the pillars of the framework and argued that some of the ideas are “ridiculous and abysmal,” although he did not specify which ones.
“Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them,” Trump said.
Trump’s effort to distance himself from Project 2025 comes as Democrats have sought to weaponize the conservative playbook to warn voters about what they say are dangerous changes to the federal government under a possible Trump administration.
President Joe Biden’s campaign was quick to respond, posting a video of Trump on X featuring comments in which the former president said the Heritage Foundation was critical to “achieve” conservative policies.
Click Here to Watch Tom Z's Interview of Project 2025 Director Paul Danz
A spokesperson for Project 2025 pushed back on claims that the framework is designed specifically for Trump, telling the Washington Examiner the group “does not speak for any candidate or campaign.”
“We are a coalition of more than 110 conservative groups advocating policy and personnel recommendations for the next conservative president,” the spokesperson said. “But it is ultimately up to that president, who we believe will be President Trump, to decide which recommendations to implement.”
“Rather than obsessing over Project 2025,” the spokesperson added, “the Biden campaign should be addressing the 25th Amendment.”
Project 2025 is part of Heritage President Kevin Roberts’s goal of using the foundation as a way to institutionalize “Trumpism” in the federal government by seeking to leverage the power of the executive branch and dismantle some federal agencies. The framework would also seek to vet government employees before they are hired.
Click Here to Watch the Newest We the People Convention News & Opinion Podcast!
Democrats have attacked the effort as a way to consolidate government power, thus “gutting” democratic processes. Biden’s campaign has also targeted the project, arguing it would “terminate the Constitution” and allow Trump to use the presidency to exact revenge on his political enemies.
Biden’s campaign especially criticized Project 2025’s proposals for reproductive rights, as the Heritage Foundation has previously called the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization “just the beginning.” The foundation has also suggested the next president should “push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America,” which some Republicans have called for through a federal abortion ban.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE NEWS IN THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
